fallacy of composition मीनिंग इन हिंदी

उदाहरण वाक्य

1. The fallacy of composition occurs if from the rationality of the individuals one infers that society can be equally rational.
2. Thus an expectation that transitivity on the part of all individuals'preferences should result in transitivity of societal preferences is an example of a fallacy of composition.
3. The converse of this fallacy is called fallacy of composition, which arises when one fallaciously attributes a property of some part of a thing to the thing as a whole.
4. The concept may suffer from the logical fallacy of composition just because of the non-closedness of the virtual species pool site which means that strictly there cannot be anything " external ".
5. In voting theory, the Condorcet paradox demonstrates a fallacy of composition : Even if all voters have rational preferences, the collective choice induced by majority rule is not transitive and hence not rational.
6. Someone unaware of the paradox of thrift would fall into a fallacy of composition and assume that what seems to be good for an individual within the economy will be good for the entire population.
7. The fallacy of composition is the converse of the fallacy of division; it may be contrasted with the case of emergence, where the whole possesses properties " not " present in the parts.
8. That is, the critique of neoclassical capital theory might be summed up as saying that it suffers from the fallacy of composition, i . e ., that we cannot simply jump from microeconomic conceptions to an understanding of production by society as a whole.
9. The credibility of this work was heavily criticized by economist Paul Krugman, who claimed that Greider ignored the fallacies of composition that run rampant in the work, misinterpreted facts ( some of which were incorrect ), and misled readers with false assumptions  all possibly due to his lack of consultation with economists.
10. Chartalists, like other Keynesians, accept the paradox of thrift, which argues that identifying behavior of individual households and the nation as a whole commits the fallacy of composition; while the paradox of thrift ( and thus deficit spending for fiscal stimulus ) is widely accepted in economics, the Chartalist form is not.